here's a random but factfull question:
lets say there is leader A,and leader B.
when leader A was in control for like,lets saaaay 10+ years. he managed he's people greatly,they managed to get over inflation and most important they startd to grow almost becoming a maturer group of people.
then he stepped down.
leader B came along. just within afew years of his control,everything ever built,went spiraling down. some say, because he had to face so much challenge in his time. but then didn't A did too???
but the biggest question here,who should be held responsible n to be blame??? The era's challenge... or the leader's own attitude,leadership and capability???